| Initiative | Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) |
| Comment Number | OL-100638 |
| Status | Catalogued |
| Classification | Substantive |
| Submitted Type | CW Web Form |
| Commenter Type | Private Citizen |
| Organization | |
| Received | 05/31/2005 06:45:11 PM |
| Document Date | |
| Remarks | |
| Pages | |
| Category | Standard Web Form |
|
| Commenter |
| First Name | Last Name | State/Province |
| Donald | Beaney | NY |
|
|
| Comment Period Start | 9/30/2004 |
| Comment Period End | 5/31/2005 |
| Phase | Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) |
| Comment Instructions | NEW ALTERNATIVE PROCESS AVAILABLE: As described in its Announcement of Alternative ADA ANPRM Comment Process, as of May 16, 2005, the Department permits commenters who wish to restrict access to their identity to send their comments to a special new mailing or electronic address. At this address, commenters’ business and personal names and addresses will be removed before their comments enter the comment processing system. Comments must initially include the sender’s name and address and must follow all of the instructions set forth in the announcement.
The Department of Justice (Department) is issuing this ANPRM in order to begin the process of adopting revised ADA standards consistent with Parts I and III of the revised guidelines implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (ABA), published by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) on July 23, 2004, at 69 FR 44083. You may submit electronic comments though this form or through www.regulations.gov. The Department strongly encourages you to read the ANPRM before submitting your comments. Unless you use the new alternative process, you may address all written comments concerning this ANPRM to P.O. Box 1032, Merrifield, VA. 22116-1032; please note that courier and overnight deliveries will not be accepted at this address. Unless you use the new alternative process, comments submitted in written or electronic form are available to the public in their entirety, including personal information.
Using this form: The fields for your full name and address, marked with asterisks, are required fields. You cannot proceed with your comment unless you fill in these fields. You may select one or more of the 54 questions posed by the Department in the ANPRM and type your answer to the question in the space provided. There are two ways to select a question: you may either enter the number of the question that you want in the box provided and click on the "Retrieve Question" button, or you may scroll through the questions listed by topic, click the question you want to select, and then click on the "Retrieve Question" button. In addition, you may choose to type a comment in the "General Comments" box provided below (4,000 characters available). You may also submit a comment as an attachment at the end of this form.
Inspection of Comments: All comments will be available throughout the comment period to the public online at WWW.ADAANPRM.ORG and, by appointment, during normal business hours, at the office of the Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, located at 1425 New York Avenue, Suite 4039, Washington, D.C. 20005. To arrange an appointment to review the comments, please contact the ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 (voice) and (800) 514-0383 (TTY). |
| Initiative Type | Federal Rulemaking |
| Agency | U. S. Department of Justice |
|
| Initiative | Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) |
| Subject | Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) |
| Docket ID | CRT Docket No. 2004-DRS01 |
| Short Title | Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities |
| Rule | Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities |
| Rule Citation | 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36 |
| Published Info | September 30, 2004 View Announcement of Alternative ADA ANPRM Comment Process (HTML) View ANPRM (HTML)  View ANPRM (PDF) View Notice to Extend Comment Period (HTML) View Notice to Extend Comment Period (PDF) (Download Adobe Reader) |
| Description | Description??? |
|
| Attachments | No Attachments |
|
|
|
| File Name | OL-100638.htm |
| File Extension | .txt |
| File Size | 2301 |
| Comments | Answers to Specific Questions
General Comments I could not find this topic in your list; Structured Settlement Protection Act, New York adopted this one on June 1, 2002. In this law, It is said that it is to protect the settlement owner. To make sure that no unfair advantage is taken in any sales of future annuities, To try to curb these sales for only hardship cases only. In my attempt to make a sale, to keep from losing my home and belongings, the judge stated in a letter, (Oct 6 2004) "The purpose of these procedure you are going through is to see that you and your family do not become dependent upon the public for your support". On Nov 26 2004, he denied my petition, after I had bared my sole. In checking out this law I have found out a few disturbing facts. 1) Because I do have these future monies coming the Legal Aid Department of North Eastern New York are not allowed to help me. And I still can not afford a lawyer! (Legal Representation). 2) This law does not apply to those who chose to take their money all up front. What's stopping them from public dependency? (Equal Justice) 3) This law does not limit itself to the original injury as to how one may become dependent upon the public only that he or she and family may. (Denies me Equal Rights because of handicap) 4) For the state to deny access to my money for the sole purpose of reimbursement, knowing that when I do ask for public assistance, the state will at that time declare my future annuities as assets and require me to sign the over. Is this not a form of embezzlement (The Rico Act) 5) This law was not in effect when my settlement was established or I would have chosen differently. After all they can't impose the death penalty on the B.T.K. suspect! After jumping through all the hoops the courts asked of me, after having to explain my spending habits for the past 5 1/2 years...I saw myself explaining my life to the courts to get permission to spend my money, what is wrong with this picture. I am not looking for any handouts or free rides, only what is mine, to do with as I see fit. With out Big Brother looking over my shoulder. If the state is so worried about us people from becoming dependent upon the public, maybe the should try to change the way the settlements are made |
| Version Date | 6/10/2005 |
| Remarks | |
| File MIME Type | text/html |
|